![]() ![]() ![]() At the very least, CC will suck up development resources that might otherwise have gone to Classic.Īdobe has sort of addressed the biggest performance pains. Lightroom CC is The Future, and labeling this one "Classic" feels like the beginning of the end. But it feels like Adobe doesn't really plan to fix the architectural problems with it, such as only being able to sync a single catalog. And it does sync files with the other versions. (The Creative Cloud app still doesn't let you selectively sync directories or files after several years, so every time I install on a new system, which I do a lot, it starts syncing the 22,000 files I have in that CC account.) Adobe's ready to serve up more storage in exchange for your money, though. You have no granular control over what lives locally or selectively sync, which means some people are going to hit that 1TB limit fast. To be fair, I'm pleasantly surprised it accurately recognized a lot of these as cats. No color labels, because you can always use the keyword "red," right? You can't search or filter on metadata - but its Sensei machine learning can find all the photos of cats you want. Like Apple, Adobe thinks it should hide pesky file names, making it impossible to quickly scan through a sea of images. It treats raw+JPEG as separate files and doesn't even have an icon to indicate which is the raw and which is the JPEG or a way to filter out one or the other. It has to catch up with the competition before it can catch up with its own big brother. It doesn't (yet) have face recognition, book creation or other ancillary capabilities of its competitors, or a plugin architecture to support more. ![]() It's Google Photos, with a few more tools, like radial and linear gradient masks, but without the automation intelligence. But it's Apple Photos, just with sync that works. Unlike its big brother, it uses a simple single-screen interface for its editing and organization. You can even set it to store photos locally, a big concern for a lot of people. It's fast enough that you don't really feel like it's pulling from the cloud, but I also tested it on a fast system with a good network connection. iPad and iPhones running iOS 11 do get support for Files as well.Īdobe considers it the solution to the "doesn't speak network" problem I mentioned earlier, and it syncs all your originals without a problem. ![]() Notice the resemblance? But the iPad version has curve editing, while the desktop version doesn't. Here's the new version of Lightroom on the iPad. Rather than bringing the power of the desktop to mobile and the cloud, Adobe has brought the limitations of mobile to the desktop. Who is Lightroom CC for?īecause it's not for Lightroom CC users.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |